top of page
  • Writer's pictureSigurður Ragnarsson

Key Amendments to the Online Safety Bill

Updated: Mar 6

The Online Safety Bill has undergone significant changes through key amendments that aim to address the evolving landscape of online platforms and the challenges that come with it. These amendments seek to strike a delicate balance between safeguarding user rights and ensuring that digital companies fulfill their responsibilities in maintaining a safe online environment. In this article, we will explore the modifications made to the bill, their implications for various stakeholders, and the legal perspectives surrounding these changes.

Understanding the Original Online Safety Bill

The original Online Safety Bill was introduced with the primary objective of creating a regulatory framework to tackle harmful content and illegal activities on online platforms. It proposed stringent measures for digital companies and aimed to establish a duty of care for them in relation to user safety. The purpose of the bill was to address the growing concerns surrounding harmful and abusive content, cyberbullying, and misinformation that have become pervasive in the digital realm.

Purpose and Provisions of the Original Bill

The original bill set out to empower the regulatory authorities to enforce compliance with online safety standards. It required online platforms to take proactive measures in identifying and removing harmful content. Additionally, it proposed the implementation of age verification mechanisms to protect minors from accessing inappropriate material. The bill also aimed to introduce transparency measures to hold digital companies accountable for their content moderation practices and to ensure transparency and fairness for users.

Furthermore, the bill sought to establish a comprehensive reporting system for users to report instances of harmful content or illegal activities. This reporting system would enable swift action and provide a mechanism for users to seek redress. It was envisioned as a crucial step in creating a safer online environment for all individuals, particularly vulnerable groups such as children and marginalized communities.

Criticisms and Controversies Surrounding the Bill

The original Online Safety Bill faced criticisms from various quarters. Critics argued that the proposed legislation posed a threat to freedom of speech and expression. Concerns were raised about the potential for overreach in content moderation, leading to censorship and hindrance of legitimate discourse. Others expressed apprehensions about the excessive burden it would impose on smaller platforms, potentially stifling innovation and competition.

Moreover, some critics questioned the effectiveness of age verification mechanisms, highlighting the challenges of implementing such measures without infringing on users' privacy rights. There were concerns that these mechanisms could inadvertently lead to the collection and misuse of personal data, raising serious privacy concerns among users.

Additionally, there were debates surrounding the role of the government in regulating online platforms. Some argued that the responsibility of ensuring online safety should primarily lie with the platforms themselves, with the government playing a limited role. Others contended that a strong regulatory framework was necessary to hold digital companies accountable and protect users from harm.

Overview of the Key Amendments

In response to the widespread concerns and feedback from stakeholders, several key amendments have been made to the Online Safety Bill. These changes aim to address the criticisms and improve the effectiveness of the legislation, striking a balance between user safety and freedom of expression.

Changes in User Rights and Protections

One of the prominent amendments relates to strengthening user rights and protections. The revised bill includes provisions to ensure that individuals have the right to challenge content removal decisions made by online platforms. It establishes a transparent appeals process, empowering users to contest unwarranted removals and seek redress for any harm caused by wrongful content moderation actions.

Moreover, the amendments emphasize the importance of preserving user anonymity where appropriate, recognizing the value of privacy and protection against potential retaliation for expressing dissenting opinions or reporting harmful content. These changes represent a step towards enhancing user empowerment and accountability within the online ecosystem.

Modifications in Responsibilities of Online Platforms

The amendments to the Online Safety Bill also address the responsibilities and obligations of online platforms. While the original bill placed a significant burden on digital companies, often criticized for its disproportionate impact on smaller platforms, the amendments seek to strike a more nuanced approach.

The revised legislation acknowledges the diversity of platforms and introduces tiered obligations based on their size and resources. This recognizes that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be appropriate and allows for a more tailored regulatory framework.

Larger platforms, with more extensive resources and user bases, are expected to bear a higher level of responsibility, while smaller platforms are subject to less stringent requirements.

Implications of the Amendments

The key amendments to the Online Safety Bill have wide-ranging implications for both online users and digital companies. These changes are expected to shape the digital landscape and influence how individuals engage with online platforms while also impacting the operations and practices of digital companies.

Impact on Online Users

For online users, the amendments bring a renewed focus on their rights and protections. The introduction of an appeals process for content removal decisions empowers individuals to challenge censorship and engage in meaningful dialogue. User anonymity provisions further safeguard expression without fear of reprisal.

The modifications also aim to enhance the trust and accountability of platforms, allowing users to have a safer and more enjoyable online experience. By imposing obligations on platforms to remove harmful content promptly, users can expect a significant reduction in the presence of abusive and dangerous material.

Consequences for Digital Companies

For digital companies, the amendments require an evaluation and potentially restructuring of their content moderation policies and practices. The tiered approach to responsibilities means that larger platforms will need to invest in robust systems and resources to ensure compliance with the higher standards expected of them.

Smaller platforms will benefit from a more proportionate regulatory approach, fostering innovation and competition within the digital sector. However, they will still need to implement reasonable measures to address harmful content, albeit with less onerous requirements compared to their larger counterparts.

Legal Perspectives on the Amendments

The key amendments to the Online Safety Bill have raised legal considerations and generated discussions regarding their strengths and weaknesses. Legal experts have analyzed the changes within the wider context of online safety legislation, focusing on their effectiveness in achieving the intended objectives.

Legal Strengths and Weaknesses of the Amendments

From a legal standpoint, the amendments demonstrate a balanced approach to addressing online safety concerns and protecting user rights. The introduction of an appeals process and user anonymity provisions enhance due process and safeguard freedom of expression.

However, critics argue that the revised bill may still lack sufficient clarity in defining harmful content, potentially leading to content moderation inconsistencies. Ensuring legal compliance and consistent enforcement while avoiding overly broad definitions remains a challenge that needs to be addressed.

Comparison with International Online Safety Laws

The key amendments have sparked comparisons with online safety laws in other countries. Countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and Germany have pursued similar legislative efforts to address online harms. By comparing these initiatives, policymakers can learn from best practices and adapt the amendments to the realities and challenges of their respective jurisdictions.

Future of the Online Safety Bill

Looking ahead, the Online Safety Bill is set to undergo further discussions and potential refinements. As the internet landscape continues to evolve rapidly, it is crucial for the legislation to remain adaptable to emerging challenges and technological advancements.

Predicted Changes and Developments

Future developments in the Online Safety Bill are likely to focus on refining the definitions of harmful content, addressing emerging threats such as deepfakes and artificial intelligence-generated content, and streamlining the regulatory processes to ensure efficiency and effectiveness.

Potential Challenges and Solutions

As the bill progresses, potential challenges may arise, requiring careful consideration and solutions. Striking the right balance between user safety and freedom of expression will remain a challenge, necessitating ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, including digital companies, civil society organizations, and individual users.

In conclusion, the key amendments to the Online Safety Bill reflect a concerted effort to address the evolving challenges of online platforms while safeguarding user rights and protecting freedom of expression. By adopting a balanced approach and taking into account the perspectives of various stakeholders, including legal considerations and international experiences, the amendments strive to create a safer and more accountable online environment for all.


bottom of page